Skip to main content

Gap Logo Disaster















Since Gap’s formation in 1969 the company had been a staple of American fashion and developed an identity for itself that stood out from the rest. 1986 saw the launch of the Gap logo we still see today, this branding has stood the test of time, and today it remains unique in style to the company, compared to other clothing company identities which can be immediately compared to similar counterparts. Strangely in the autumn of 2010 Gap launched a new logo, this took investors and customers by surprise, no one seemed aware of the decision to update the branding and change the staple of the Gap brand; the logo. A new logo was launched, one that featured a poor gradient swatch square hastily slapped together and a simple but terribly overused Helvetica typeface set in bold. This logo was immediately mocked by the design community and it wasn’t long before the whole world had caught on to what was viewed as the terrible new Gap logo. It was reported however that this new logo was merely a PR strategy to increase the media coverage of the Gap name across the globe as they brushed it off as a crowd sourcing project and soon reverted back to their previous logo. Lessons can be learnt from the would-be disaster at Gap, the new logo was estimated to have cost them over 100 million US dollars. Designers of the new Gap logo also did not consider that the main US competitor of Gap; American Apparel use Helvetica extensively throughout their advertising and branding guidelines. This gives cause to reason that the design was indeed a PR stunt from the company, as the consequences had the new style been rolled out would have been catastrophic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EE Rebranding Process

UK mobile phone operators Orange and T-Mobile who merged to become Everything Everywhere, later simplified their name to EE. As of 2016, EE is soaring in profits, seeing a 10% increase to over £6.5bn in revenue in the three years from 2010 to 2013. More recently EE was purchased by the UK communication giant British Telecom Group more commonly known as BT. The success of EE’s new status as a highly successful mobile phone operator is underpinned by that of their successful rebranding strategy. This sentence itself is a relative contradiction as from the two years that followed from 2010, when Orange and T-Mobile merged the company traded under the brand name ‘Everything Everywhere’ this didn’t appear to catch on, rollout of this brand was slow, and to many people Orange and T-Mobile were trading exactly as they always have. Small trial concept Everything Everywhere stores were launched and the predicted feedback came back that the company was struggling to get the new bran...

City of Las Vegas Logo

The new City of Las Vegas Government logo in my opinion is there in thought and concept but the end result isn't as great as it should be. The typography is in keeping with the clear 1960's Googie style they were aiming for but through the bad stroke on the V and the strange arrangement of lettering specifically the last S is odd and seems a little rushed. The original logo was far more appropriate to what I would think of as more the corporate professional logo for the Las Vegas Government and I feel that the other is just trying to make the brand feel more youthful and modern but isn't quite successful. For this visual identity, we choose the font Big Noodle Titling for the “CITY OF” type because of its wonderful clarity in any medium. Big Noodle captures an industrial feel with a modern, progressive flair that is perfectly timeless. The “Las Vegas” type originated from the font, Stay High by Syed Faraz Ahmed. We transformed each letter to embody the mood and sty...

Virgin Holidays Live Advert

“The tension in the room was unbelievable” Virgin Holidays recently produced a live advert for TV something to be shown once to a captive audience that had to flow perfectly and required months of planning. The advert did feature some errors and mistakes but I feel this actually helped reinforce the point that the video at each location is live, this isn't something that's been filmed in advance and edited nicely together in a cosy studio, it's raw, it's new and it doesn't always go as planned. I pulled this quote from Creative Review who themselves wrote an article on the ad. “The tension in the room was unbelievable,” says Ratigan of the broadcast moment, which took place at ITN Productions’ Master Control room in London. “There was a fair amount of noise from the gallery director and technicians, but the client, agency and production company people, including myself, were silent. There was nothing we could do except wait and watch.” I think what Ratiga...